Eminem Controversey essays

Eminem Controversey articles Eminem has been directly in the center of many warmed conversations since the drop of his collection The Slim Shady LP. Numerous individuals accept that Eminem is conditioning todays youth with his verses, yet right? Or on the other hand is Eminem simply one more character being depicted by Marshall Mathers III. Is Marshall any unique in relation to a portion of the famous actors that go on screen and change from an ordinary person to an executioner? Numerous individuals are attempting to demonstrate that he is extraordinary; they need Eminem out of the music business and out of the big time out and out. Be that as it may, things dont precisely appear to be going their direction. Marshall just continues selling an ever increasing number of records, and in November 2002 he made his big screen debut in the hit film 8-Mile. Numerous individuals are likewise asking, is Marshall Mathers actually the awful kid the he plays in his music and motion pictures? In spite of the fact that Marshal l has confronted weapon and attack charges, many accept that he is not even close to the fierce, contemptuous, homophobic individual that he plays. Some really see Marshall as a cherishing, caring dad who is not even close to the character that he plays in his music. By inspecting the two sides of this contention, we can see whether Eminems verses are a disservice to society or innocuous diversion. As there are numerous individuals that absolutely loathe of Eminem a gathering called GLAAD (Gays and Lesbians Against Defamation) is among Eminems pundits. Gays and lesbians who state he is a homophobe all the time challenge Eminem. In any case, the transparently gay pop star Elton John thinks in an unexpected way. I like a portion of the Eminem stuff since its sort of sharp. I like the mood, I like the demeanor, and I can suppose I was a little youngster now, Id like that(CNN June 14, 2001). Elton John additionally did a two part harmony with Eminem during the Grammy grants in February of 2001. During the two part harmony the two sang a melody composed by Marshall about a crazed Eminem fan that executes himself and his significant other who is pregnant with his kid. Behind... <!

Hippos essays

Hippos papers The Hippopotamuses is an exceptionally incredible, mindful, and odd creature. The hippo is a creature that has numerous uquine highlights and diets. They may just live in one spot yet they make the best out of it. They love their young and secure it to. They will adjust to nearly anything. Hippos regard one another and have regions. The hippos look resembles no different creatures on the planet. The first of the major noticeable things about it is its teeth. They are gigantic, sharp, and long. They are made out of ivory a hair like substance. The hippo is a colossal, land and/or water capable animal. They weigh up to 2500 to 3000 (Dolon). Their skin is a record earthy colored shading to sloppy earthy colored, with purplish spots. An odd component the hippo has is its eyes, ears, and nostrils on the highest point of the head. Truth be told its head weighs about on third of its body weight, the neck is gauges more than the head (Brust 5). The hippo is the third biggest land creature is the world (Brust 1). The hippo is 12 to 5 feet in length and 5 feet t all and can open its mouth around 3 feet, the tail matches 21 and 24 inches in length as well (Dolon). Africa is home to numerous uncommon and one of a kind creatures including elephants, rhinos and hippos. Hippos like to live in Central Africa where there is loads of streams and bounteous vegetation. Huge populaces of hippo happen in the Nile River Valley of east Africa (Sheffer). They like profound water to they can swim, rest, and predators cannot get to them. One prime thing hippos search for are contiguous riverbeds, are reed bedding. They like the warm temperature of the sub-Saharan Africa, which make it hippos heaven. On the off chance that a hippo going to live anyplace they normally need to live in streams close to fields. Hippos live in crowds of 5 to 30 (Dolon). The Hippo is an enormous veggie lover, eating many diminishes in its way. They eat natural product, grass, leaves, and vegetables. Their principle diet during the day is they rest and flounder around eating water plants. Around evening time they eat their primary eating routine and return ... <!

Admitted Applicants! - UGA Undergraduate Admissions

Admitted Applicants! - UGA Undergraduate Admissions Admitted Applicants! For those of you who have been admitted to UGA, here is a post for you, and a chance to comment. Congratulations to all of the freshman who were admitted to UGA, and we look forward to you becoming a part of the Bulldog Nation. The next steps for a new student can be seen in our New Dawg site, so go ahead and review what you need to do next. You have until May 1 to submit a deposit to hold a spot in our freshman class, and we hope the next stage of the admission process is a little less nerve wracking than the decision process. As you celebrate this time, make sure to be considerate of others in your school who may not have been admitted. Good luck in the next stage of the college admissions process, and Go Dawgs!

The Career As A Medical Doctor And A Guerilla Fighter

Howe graduated from Harvard thereafter he joined the Greek Revolutionist as a medical doctor and a guerilla fighter (Kleege, 2002). After the war Howe was offered the opportunity to open a New England asylum for the Blind in Boston (Wittenstein, 2013), which later became the Perkins School for the Blind (Hatlen, 2000). With no background in education, Samuel G. Howe began his career as an educator of the blind, including people who were deaf/blind, in 1829 (Ajuwon Oyinlade, 2008; Kleege, 2002). Howe based his school, the Perkins School for the Blind, on the European models of schools for the Blind (Ajuwon Oyinlade, 2008; Hatlen, 2000). However, he only picked the most suitable methods that he thought would be able to benefit his students the most (Kleege, 2002). He did not only educate the students who were blind. Laura Bridgman was Howe’s first deaf/blind student. She is also known as his first miracle (Smith Anton, 1997). One of Howe’s first contribution to the field of visual impairments, was his efforts to teach blind veterans, adults and enslaved people, who did not have access to schools where blind children were taught while still in the military (Wittenstein, 2013). Further, his encouragement to other states in the U.S. to start their own schools for the visually impaired was another contribution to the field of education of the visually impaired (Wittenstein, 2013). Further, he was seen as a leader in the field of education of blind and deaf/blindShow MoreRelated The Cuban Revolution and the Triumph of Women in Cuba Essay2996 Words   |  12 PagesCuban foreign minister in 1958, Andrà ©s Vargas Gà ³mez, She was a sacred creature and it was her right to have precedence in all things. While the number of professional women in Cuba grew throughout the first half of the twentieth century (lawyers, doctors, businesswomen, journalists, teachers, and musicians), the huge discrepancy between them and the average Cuban woman was not shr inking. The view of women as pura o putas existed, and equality was a long way away. According to Lois M. Smith and AlfredRead MoreMarketing Management 14th Edition Test Bank Kotler Test Bank173911 Words   |  696 Pagesproduct alliance B) logistics alliance C) pricing collaboration D) network alliance E) promotional alliance Answer: E Page Ref: 51 Objective: 2 AACSB: Analytic skills Difficulty: Easy 61) Abbot Laboratories warehouses and delivers 3Ms medical and surgical products to hospitals across the United States. The best description of this form of alliance would be a(n) ________. A) product alliance B) logistics alliance C) pricing collaboration D) indirect collaboration E) promotional alliance Read MoreOne Significant Change That Has Occurred in the World Between 1900 and 2005. Explain the Impact This Change Has Made on Our Lives and Why It Is an Important Change.163893 Words   |  656 Pagescentury. Attentive to differences across cultures and regions and under varying political regimes, Smith chronicles the struggles of women to improve their situation within the domestic sphere and the conditions under which they labored to expand the career opportunities available to them at different times and in diverse settings. She places special emphasis on the important but often overlooked roles they played in politics, particularly those associated with resistance movements, and their contributions

Organizational Behavior And The Organization - 1038 Words

It is important to understand what behavior and culture in an organization means in order to have a better understanding of the whole scenario. From this perspective, then a manager can better know how to incorporate what he or she knows and what the organization at large is comprised of. According to Borkowski, (2011), the definition provided states that â€Å"organizational behavior is the study of individuals and group’s dynamics within an organization setting† (p.3). Organizational culture on the other hand can be described as the system where shared values, beliefs and actions are developed thereby, guiding the behavior of the organization. It is therefore imperative to understand that there is bound to be a certain behavior in any†¦show more content†¦These behaviors definitely play an important role in developing, enhancing the overall performance of the organization, the individual and groups by bringing satisfaction and encouraging commitment to eac h other’s part. Communication, motivation and leadership are concepts within the organizational behavior and are therefore considered as skills managers and leaders need to possess in order to lead the dynamic and complex industry of healthcare (Borkowski, 2011, p.4). Healthcare has definitely evolved with time and given the service related intensity of this industry managers should be able to predict influence the behavior or employees in order to achieve the goals for their organizations. Managers are expected to understand the causes of workplace problems, conflicts, stress thereby minimizing negative outcomes. These changes in healthcare has seen patients becoming more informed and in turn have more expectations of their care providers and the hospital organizations. These trends and changes, therefore, have forced managers and leaders change how employees carry out their job responsibilities. Workplace communication is essential as information is relayed from one individual to another or from one department to another and therefore the way it is transmitted and received will ensure efficiency and effectiveness. Through communication managers can organize,

Formal Outline Template Free Essays

GUIDE TO FORMAL OUTLINING I. The outline should be in sentence form. A. We will write a custom essay sample on Formal Outline Template or any similar topic only for you Order Now That means that each section of the outline must be a complete sentence B. Each part may only have one sentence in it. II. Each Roman numeral should be a main section of the speech. A. Capital letters are main points of the thesis. 1. Numbers are sub-points under the capital letters. 2. Little letters are sub-points under the numbers. B. Sub-points need to correspond with the idea it is under. 1. This means that capital letters refer to the idea in roman numerals. 2. This means that numbers refer to the idea in the capital letter. III. All sub-points should be indented the same. A. This means that all of the capital letters are indented the same. B. All numbers are indented the same. IV. No sub-point stands alone. A. Every A must have a B. B. Every 1 must have a 2. C. You don’t need to have a C or a 3, but you can. D. There are no exceptions to this rule. Your speech outline should look something like the one in the sample. Your outline will also include the full sentence details of your speech, including source citations. The number of sub-points will differ in each speech and for each main idea. FORMAL SENTENCE OUTLINE FORMAT Student’s Name: Date: Topic: General Purpose: Specific Purpose: Key statement that describes the topic of your speech To inform OR To persuade Your specific purpose identifies the information you want to communicate (in an informative speech) or the attitude or behavior you want to change (in a persuasive speech). The central idea of your speech (should predict, control and obligate). Thesis: I. Introduction A. Attention Getter: Something that grabs the attention of the audience. Examples of this: startling statistics, stories, rhetorical questions, quotations, scenarios, etc. This point should be more than one entence long. Why should the audience listen to your speech, make it personal to each of them. Exact same statement as above. B. Reason to Listen: C. D. Thesis Statement: Credibility Statement: 1. 2. What personally connects you to this topic? What type of research have you done to establish credibility? E. Preview of Main Points: 1. 2. 3. First, I will describe †¦ Second, I will examine †¦ Third, I will discuss†¦ II. Restate thesis, exact statement as above. A. Statement of the first main point; you should not use a source in this sentence. 1. Idea of development or support for the first main point a. Support material (ex: statistics, quotation, etc. – cite source) b. Support material (ex: statistics, quotation, etc. – cite source) 2. More development or support a. b. Support material (ex: statistics, quotation, etc. – cite source) Support material (ex: statistics, quotation, etc. – cite source) 3. Transition: More development if needed (Required) Statement of movement that looks back (internal summary) and looks forward (preview). Statement of second main point. Do not use a source in this statement. 1. Idea of development or support for the first main point a. b. . Support material (ex: statistics, quotation, etc. – cite source) Support material (ex: statistics, quotation, etc. – cite source) B. More development or support a. b. Support material (ex: statistics, quotation, etc. – cite source) Support material (ex: statistics, quotation, etc. – cite source) 3. Transition: More development if needed (Required) Statement of mo vement that looks back (internal summary) and looks forward (preview). Statement of third main point. Do not use a source in this statement. 1. Idea of development or support for the first main point a. b. . Support material (ex: statistics, quotation, etc. – cite source) Support material (ex: statistics, quotation, etc. – cite source) C. More development or support a. b. 3. Support material (ex: statistics, quotation, etc. – cite source) Support material (ex: statistics, quotation, etc. – cite source) More development if needed III. Conclusion A. Review of Main Points: 1. 2. 3. B. C. Restate your first main point. Restate your second main point. Restate you third main point. Exact same as above. Develop a creative closing that will give the speech a sense of ending. This point may be more than one sentence. You should refer back to your AttentionGetter. Restate Thesis: Closure: References APA format; all references need to be sited in APA format. Electronic sources must be . edu, . gov, or . org in order to be acceptable. Be sure to make sure that the references are in Alphabetical order. Double-Spaced; all references should be double-spaced and indented. Five source minimum: You must have at least five sources cited in your outline and listed on your reference page. Make sure to provide all necessary information in the references. How to cite Formal Outline Template, Essay examples

To what extent was Count Camillo Benso di Cavour dedicated to the unification of Italy in the Period 1848 1961 Essay Example

To what extent was Count Camillo Benso di Cavour dedicated to the unification of Italy in the Period 1848 1961? Paper It is suggested that the most notable achievement of Count Camille di Cavour was to preside over the unification of Italy in the period 1848-1861. It was a few weeks before his death, in 1860, that the Kingdom of Italy was proclaimed after many centuries which had seen Italy divided into separate states. Together with others, such as Garibaldi and Victor Emmanuel II, it is unquestionable that Cavour played a major role in the unification of Italy. Cavours foreign policy (his relationship with both France and Britain) and his early career and beliefs make up the focal points of this argument. However, there is an issue of debate amongst historians that questions how dedicated Cavour was to total unification. Historians such as Mack Smith and Hearder, that question his dedication, express the view that Cavour was more interested in expelling foreign influence and creating a powerful, dominant Northern Kingdom of Italy shaped by Piedmont. They also concentrate on Cavours poor relationsh ip with other protagonists, such as Garibaldi and Mazzini, to further champion their belief. Those historians who suggest that Cavours actions showed his dedication to the unification of Italy look at his early career and beliefs shown within Il Risorgimento. Cavour, born in 1810, lived in the capital city of Piedmont, Turin. Before becoming Prime Minister in 1852, Cavour used his and Cesare Balbos co-owned journal Il Risorgimento to illustrate his ideas for a united Italy. Founded in 1847 after Charles Albert had freed the press from censorship, Il Risorgimento allowed Cavour to publicise his political ideas for the future. Mack Smith states, its programme was to champion liberal conservatism and moderate reforms1. One of his main recommendations was for a constitution2; he wanted to totally change how Piedmont was run. Cavour was dedicated to the bettering of Piedmont as a state and improving Italy as a country. He also wrote numerous articles full of patriotic rhetoric3 speaking of his nation (both Piedmont and Italy). He wanted the best for Italy and was therefore commit ted to the creation of an Italy free of foreign influence Cavour wished to pronounce these ideas to his audience. It is with this that it can be argued that Cavour was dedicated to unification during his early life. We will write a custom essay sample on To what extent was Count Camillo Benso di Cavour dedicated to the unification of Italy in the Period 1848 1961? specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on To what extent was Count Camillo Benso di Cavour dedicated to the unification of Italy in the Period 1848 1961? specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on To what extent was Count Camillo Benso di Cavour dedicated to the unification of Italy in the Period 1848 1961? specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer However, the evidence that suggests that Cavours beliefs displayed in Il Risorgimento exhibited his desire to create a totally unified Italy is weak. Whilst stating that Cavour was committed to the creation of an Italy free of foreign influence, Mack Smith does not state that Cavour wished for a Kingdom of Italy to be formed. It can therefore be argued that all Cavour wanted was to remove Austrian influence in order to allow Piedmont to expand into the Austrian controlled Lombardy and Venetia, depicting Cavours lack of dedication to the unification of Italy. Subsequently, this point cannot be completely relied on to sustain the argument that Cavour was committed to the creation of the Kingdom of Italy. Cavour was elected as Prime Minister in 1852. His foreign policy from then onwards is also used by historians such as Mack Smith, Hearder and Stiles to strengthen the argument that Cavour was dedicated to the unification of Italy. Cavours immediate aim was to break up the Dreikaiserband, the alliance between Germany, Russia and Austria. Accordingly, Cavour attempted to raise Piedmonts standing with Britain and France4, joining them in the Crimean War in 1854. Cavour could not envisage his country from becoming isolated from the Great Powers5. Cavour needed the backing of these countries in order to successfully create a united Italy. It can therefore be argued that Cavours subtle diplomacy6 shows that he was dedicated to the unification of Italy. Martin Collier completely contradicts this point; he states, the king was prepared to appoint a pro-war prime minister such as Count Thaon de Revel because of Cavours reluctance for war in 18557, suggesting that Cavour was in fact not in favour of entering the Crimean War and therefore not interested in allying with Britain and France, which would have helped the Italian cause. That is, his disinterest in building a relationship with Britain and France through joining them in war implies that he was not keen on unifying Italy. Furthermore, the reliability of Hearders evidence can be questioned. Hearders viewpoint appears limited, due to the sheer number of books he has written on Cavour and unification, showing his blatant focus on his role in the formation of Italy. It can therefore be argued that Hearder might be favourable in his views towards Cavour and his actions, concentrating on his dedication to the unification of Italy despite the strong evidence to suggest otherwise. Thus, the evidence provided by Hearder should not be the basis for the argument that proposes that Cavour was dedicated to the unification of Italy. Nevertheless, once Cavour had the camaraderie of Napoleon III and Lord Palmerston he made full use of its advantages. At the Congress of Paris in1856, Cavour was able to negotiate on equal terms with the Great Powers8, as Stiles states, and succeeded in raising the issue of Italy9. Consequently, Napoleon III and Cavour met at Plombià ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½res. It was here that the idea of war with Austria was discussed and eventually agreed. Therefore, it can be argued that Cavour, through use of his political skill, raised the idea of Italian unification amongst the major European powers and thus was dedicated to the process. Finally, historians use Cavours resignation after the Treaty of Villafranca (in which peace was declared without a Piedmontese representative apparent) to strengthen their argument. Cavour felt that Napoleon III had betrayed the Italian cause and therefore resigned in order to show his discontent. Thus, Stiles and Duggans interpretations of Cavours foreign policy can be us ed along with Mack Smiths and Hearders to strengthen the argument that Cavour was dedicated to the unification of Italy. Whilst agreeing that to some extent Cavour was dedicated to the unification of Italy, Mack Smith states, Cavour should perhaps be called a patriot rather than a nationalist. In his own way he was like them an idealist, but he was far more pragmatic and empirical in his approach to the national problem. Whereas the radicals argued from the theory to the facts, he began with the facts and was ready to fight for national unification only when the facts seemed to justify it [after Garibaldis successful expedition to the South in 1860], only when the forces for unification seemed to be sufficient and to have enough of their own10. This therefore shows that it can be strongly argued that Cavour was not interested (and therefore not dedicated) to the unification of Italy until 1860 when the idea was forced upon him. Despite the evidence that suggests Cavour was dedicated to the unification of Italy, there is a stronger argument that most historians focus on contradicting the preceding evidence. Giuseppe Mazzini, whilst taking a backseat in the later stages, was a prominent figure in the early phases of the Risorgimento. Young Italy, founded in 1831, had a significant impact on the political development of Italy. Its founder, Mazzini, believed that people should live in an independent nation of free men and equals11. It was together with his protà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½gà ¯Ã‚ ¿Ã‚ ½e, Garibaldi, that the Italian Question became an international affair. Cavours open condemnation of Mazzinian principals, to many, suggests that Cavour was not dedicated to the unification of Italy. It is clear to see that Cavour and Mazzini differed significantly on points of principle. Cavour believed that revolutionary action, promoted by Mazzini to unify Italy, would be detrimental to Piedmonts position; firstly, unification with the backward South would ruin Piedmonts reputation as a powerful state and secondly, a revolution would upset Piedmonts political stability. Thus, Cavours hatred of Mazzinian views shows his lack of dedication to unification. Mack Smith states, Cavour used to tell people that Mazzini ought to be arrested and executed without pity12. As a result, Cavour was willing to side with Austria in order to see that a number of Mazzinians were imprisoned. This can therefore be used to suggest that Cavour was willing to go to any extent in order to stop Mazzini and his followers, which subsequently implies that he was uncommitted to unification. Furthermore, Mack Smith states, the Mazzinians said that they wanted national unity far more than they wanted a republic13, showing that they were willing to compromise. Cavour on the contrary said that he would refuse an alliance with them even if it meant Italy remained divided14, which displays his stubbornness. Hence, it can be argued that Cavour was not dedicated to the unification of Italy. Overall, Dennis Mack Smith appears to give a balanced argument. He both emphasises Cavours dedication to the unification of Italy and considers evidence that suggests otherwise. However, Mack Smiths support should be considered with a critical approach, as he has written a number of books on Cavours life including his biography. It is not surprising that other historians such as Collier regard Mack Smiths judgements as generous15. They argue that Mack Smith, especially within his biography, places emphasis on Cavours positive role in unification rather than his failings. Therefore, whilst references towards Mack Smiths viewpoints should not be ignored, it can be argued that there may be elements of bias within them, discrediting them as a basis for the overall line of reasoning. Historians, also often use Cavours poor relationship with Garibaldi as evidence to support the idea that Cavour was not dedicated to the unification of Italy. Giuseppe Garibaldi came into contact with Mazzini in 1833 after he joined Young Italy. For a while, he was the most widely known figure in the world and a national hero; Garibaldi was charismatic and dedicated to the cause of Italian unification. Tension arose between the two figureheads after the ceding of Nice and Savoy to France in the summer months of 1860 (Nice being Garibaldis birthplace). Nice and Savoy had been used as a bargaining tool to secure the support of France in the war against Austria. Cavour seemed to prefer the less immediately attractive but apparently more realistic idea of a gradually expanding Piedmont if necessary, sacrificing national territory in the process16. This confirmed Garibaldis own suspicion that Cavour was not dedicated to unification, as by giving away Italian states a totally unified Ital y could never be achieved. Furthermore, Cavours reaction to Garibaldis expedition to unite the South in 1860 is used to support the argument that Cavour was uncommitted to unification. Although Cavour was limited by both public opinion and political paralysis, he still tried to stop the expedition. He dared not oppose Garibaldi openly, since Piedmontese public opinion was enthusiastic about the expedition [therefore] Cavour did his best to thwart Garibaldi and the Thousand covertly17. It was important that Cavour was seen to support Garibaldi but he had to make sure his vision rather than Garibaldis or Mazzinis was assured18. Cavour confiscated the expeditions weapons, ordered his navy to arrest the expedition at all costs and asked France to stop Garibaldi crossing the straights of Messina in his bid to unify Italy. In private letters he said how little he approved of Garibaldis foolish venture. Cavour tried to make the king think that Garibaldi was using the royal name for a purpose which has nothing whateve r to do with the monarchy19. Collier argues, Cavours actions in 1860 were not of a man with a desire to unify Italy20 instead he was more interested in taking control over the actions of the protagonists. After Garibaldis success in the South it was clear that Cavour had to annex the South quickly to regain control over the situation; Darby goes far enough to state, we can see that Cavour was in effect forced into unifying Italy just to stop Garibaldi21 and argues that it was a desperate gamble to preserve an enlarged Piedmont22. Thus, although Cavour is regarded as one of the Founding Fathers of Italy, it can be strongly argued that Cavour was forced into unification and that Cavours covert operation in order to stop union with the South demonstrates Cavours lack of dedication to the unification of Italy.

Titanis Prehistoric Bird Facts and Figures

Titanis Prehistoric Bird Facts and Figures Name: Titanis (Greek for titanic); pronounced tie-TAN-iss Habitat: Plains of North America Historical Epoch: Pliocene-Early Pleistocene (5-2 million years ago) Size and Weight: About eight feet tall and 300 pounds Diet: Meat Distinguishing Characteristics: Large size; large, heavy bill; bipedal posture; grasping hands About Titanis To many avid horror fans, Titanis will be familiar as the predatory bird in James Robert Smiths best-selling novel The Flock. This prehistoric bird could certainly wreak its share of mayhem: at eight feet tall and 300 pounds (give or take a few inches and pounds for possible sexually dimorphic differences between males and females), the early Pleistocene Titanis closely resembled its theropod dinosaur forebears that went extinct 60 million years before, especially considering   its puny arms, massive head and beak, fully bipedal posture, and long-taloned, grasping hands. Like other so-called terror birds, Titanis had a particularly gruesome hunting style. This long-legged bird easily outran the smaller mammals, lizards and birds of its North American ecosystem, at which point it would grasp its hapless prey in its long, wingless, taloned hands, convey it to its heavy beak, bash it repeatedly on the ground until it was dead, and then (assuming it was small enough) swallow it whole, perhaps spitting out the bones and fur. In fact, Titanis was so well-adapted overall that some paleontologists believe this bird managed to survive up to the very end of the Pleistocene epoch; however, convincing fossil evidence for this has yet to be discovered. As scary as it was, Titanis wasnt the most dangerous carnivorous bird of prehistoric times, and not as deserving of the epithet titanic as the truly enormous Elephant Bird and Giant Moa. In fact, Titanis was merely a late North American descendant of a family of South American meat-eaters, the phorusrachids (typified by Phorusrhacos and Kelenken, both also classified as terror birds), which attained comparable sizes. By the early Pleistocene epoch, about two million years ago, Titanis had managed to penetrate from its ancestral South American habitat to as far north as Texas and southern Florida, the latter of which is The Flocks modern-day setting.

Definition and Examples of Assemblage Errors in English

Definition and Examples of Assemblage Errors in English Definition In  speech  and  writing, an assemblage error  is an unintentional rearrangement of sounds, letters, syllables, or words. Also called a movement error or slip of the tongue. As linguist Jean Aitchison explains below, assemblage errors provide important information about the way humans prepare and produce speech. See Examples and Observations below. Also see: Aphasia Cognitive Linguistics and Psycholinguistics EggcornsMalapropismsMalapropisms and Mondegreens: Unintentional Word PlayMetathesisMispronunciation Slip of the Ear, Slip of the Pen, and Slip of the Tongue SpoonerismVerbal Play Examples and Observations A . . . common form of assemblage error is anticipation, which occurs when a person utters a word or sound too early. Instead of saying that he or she is about to make an important point, a person might anticipate the oi sound and say impoitant point. Words can also be anticipated, as in the phrase when you buy the laundry, instead of when you take the laundry, buy me some cigarettes. In other cases, people sometimes repeat sounds, saying a tall toy instead of a tall boy. These mistakes most frequently occur close together, within a single phrase. This suggests that people plan the entire phrase before saying it, choosing and arranging several words at a time and then occasionally misassembling the parts.(William D. Allstetter, Speech and Hearing. Chelsea House, 1991) Main Types of Assemblage Errors- These misorderings are of three main types: anticipations (premature insertion), as in she shells sea shells, exchanges or transpositions (place swapping), as in cling spreaning spring c leaning, and perseverations (repetitions), as in one-way woad one-way road. Such errors provide important information about the way humans prepare and produce speech: for example, the large number of anticipations, compared with perseverations, indicates that humans are thinking ahead as they speak, and are able to erase the memory of what they have said quite fast. Assemblage errors contrast with selection errors, in which a wrong item has been chosen. Together, these form the two major subdivisions within slips of the tongue (speech errors). A similar distinction can be made within slips of the pen (writing errors), and slips of the hand (signing errors).(Jean Aitchison, A Glossary of Language and Mind. Oxford University Press, 2003)- Not all slips fit neatly into one or other of the categories suggested earlier. For example, is conversation for conservation a selection error, in which one similar-sounding word has been picked instead of another? Or an assemblage error, in which t he [s] and [v] were reversed? Or what about the student who, describing her new boyfriend, said Hes such a lovely huskuline man. Was this a genuine blend, in which the similar-meaning words husky and masculine had been bundled together, when she meant to say only one? Or was it a telescopic blend, in which two adjacent words had been telescoped together in a hurry, so that what she had really meant to say was husky AND masculine? Or what went wrong in the slip peach seduction for speech production? This one is especially hard to categorize.(Jean Aitchison, Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon, 4th ed. Wiley-Blackwell, 2012) Implications of Movement (Assemblage) Errors[M]ovement errors have provided a basis for claims that sentence-planning processes proceed in distinct processing levels, and that lexical and segmental content are significantly dissociated from their phrasal environments in the computational processes that build sentence form. . . .The two levels of sentence processing indicated by the movement errors correlate directly with two major types of lexical processing implied by the patterns of lexical substitution errors. The two levels of sentence structure motivated by the several types of movement errors may plausibly be associated, respectively, with a conceptually driven process that provides lexical content for abstract syntactic structures, and with a form-driven process that associates the phonological descriptions of words with their phrasal environments.(Merrill F. Garrett, Lexical Retrieval Process: Semantic Field Effects. Frames, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization, ed. by Adrienne Lehrer and Eva Feder Kittay. Lawrence Erlbaum, 1992) The Lighter Side of Assemblage ErrorsOnce a time upon, a gritty little pearl named Little Rude Riding Head had a gasket for her branny.She had . . .. . . a broaf of homemade lead,. . . a wottle of bine,. . . grapples and apes,. . . three or four belly jeans,. . . a bag of pollilops,. . . some shop chewey,. . . a twelve-inch peese chizza. . . some sicken noodle choop,. . . some plack-eyed bees,. . . and a bottle of boot rear.(Rob Reid, Something Funny Happened at the Library: How to Create Humorous Programs for Children and Young Adults. American Library Association, 2003)

Medea (video) Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Medea (video) - Essay Example She defies the prevalent male chauvinism by murdering Glauce and the society abhors her. Additionally, although the book clearly indicates that Medea loved her children, the video portrays her as a jealous irrational woman whose appearance scares away even her own children. This is a conscious move by the director to expose the perceived animosity of Medea. It portrays her as a brutally proud woman who is reluctant to let her opponents succeed. Although the book portrays Medea as a typical traditional woman fighting against social ills, the video portrays her as a cunning and cold schemer. It gives her the ability to see through the deceitful values and false pieties of her enemies. The video portrays Medea as loving and caring. This is evident through the actions that she did to Jason when they first met. However, one keeps on wondering whether Medea had ever experienced love before she met Jason. Although the book portrays Medea as an abnormal person, the video portrays her as a normal human being with feelings. Her heart turns into vengeance upon discovering that Jason was planning to marry another

Traditional Marketing Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

Traditional Marketing - Essay Example Traditional marketing is in effect focused on markets and products, giving little consideration to customers - what they want and need, how they buy and when. Adrian Payne (1991) notes that "traditional marketing concentrates on product features, has minimal interest in customer service, limited customer contact, and where quality is primarily a concern of production." The marketing mix approach is "too limited to provide a usable framework for assessing and developing customer relationships in many industries and should be replaced by an alternative model in which the focus is on customers and relationships (Gordon, I., 1999)." For these reasons, not a few companies soon found traditional marketing ineffective in selling consumer products. If sales were made at all, the level does not warrant the expense sunk in the traditional marketing tools such as radio, TV and outdoor ads as well as trade shows and direct mail. Gradually, it was acknowledged that traditional marketing is not suitable for selling relatively low-value products to the broad masses of customers. In this case, the sales income is often not commensurate with the advertising and promotional costs. In the search for a marketing system that would broaden the product scope and concentrate on how to retain customers instead of simply attracting customers to products and services, marketing experts came up with the idea o... The earliest users of the term relationship marketing included Len Berry (1983) and Jag Sheth at Emory. Theodoro Levitt (1983) of Harvard subsequently expanded the initial concept to cover activities beyond individual transactions. Customer retention is at the heart of relationship marketing. Unlike the traditional marketing approach, which goes by one-shot individual transactions, relationship marketing seeks to build longer-term relationships with the customers. Thus, it calls for ways to understand the customer's needs as they go through their life cycle and provides a range of products or services as the customers need these at each cycle. In short, keeping the customers forever (Gordon, I., 1999). The idea of seeking to provide the customer's specific needs at each phase of his life led to the development of relationship marketing. Increased profitability is the common objective of both the traditional and relationship marketing strategies but the most glaring difference is that one makes a sale and then moves on to another prospect, while the other stays with one customer longer to attend to all his needs. This is service marketing at work, which means servicing the customer's necessities from childhood to adolescence, from middle age to his senior years. Less Cost, More Benefits The advantage of relationship marketing is that despite the expanded scope and longer attention span provided by the companies to customers, the cost of retaining an existing customer is said to be about 10 per cent less than the cost required in acquiring a new customer. Moreover, the company derived other benefits such as referrals. (Wikipedia)

John Locke :: Empiricists, Empiricism

John Locke's, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690), was first criticized by the philosopher and theologian, John Norris of Bemerton, in his "Cursory Reflections upon a Book Call'd, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding," and appended to his Christian Blessedness or Discourses upon the Beatitudes (1690). Norris's criticisms of Locke prompted three replies, which were only posthumously published. Locke has been viewed, historically, as the winner of this debate; however, new evidence has emerged which suggests that Norris's argument against the foundation of knowledge in sense-perception that the Essay advocated was a valid and worthy critique, which Locke did, in fact, take rather seriously. Charlotte Johnston's "Locke's Examination of Malebranche and John Norris" (1958), has been widely accepted as conclusively showing that Locke's replies were not philosophical, but rather personal in origin; her essay, however, overlooks critical facts that undermin e her subjective analysis of Locke's stance in relation to Norris's criticisms of the Essay. This paper provides those facts, revealing the philosophical—not personal—impetus for Locke's replies. INTRODUCTION "Locke's Examination of Malebranche and John Norris" (1958), by Charlotte Johnston,1 connects John Locke's posthumously published treatise on the philosophy of Nicolas Malebranche to the replies he had written to an English philosopher and theologian, John Norris of Bemerton. When Locke first published An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1690),2 Norris, aided by the philosophy of Malebranche, responded with the first critique of the Essay, entitled "Cursory Reflections upon a Book call'd, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding," and appended to Norris's Christian Blessedness or Discourses upon the Beatitudes (1690).3 Three texts: "JL to Mr. Norris" (1692), An Examination of P. Malebranche's Opinion of Seeing All Things in God (1693),4 and Some Remarks Upon Some of Mr. Norris's Books, wherein he asserts P. Malebranche's Opinion of our Seeing all Things in God (1693),5 according to Johnston, were all a direct response to Norris. Johnston's essay, which has been widely accepted, clearly shows the interrelatedness of the texts; however, her appraisal of them as a response to Norris, incorrectly devalues their philosophical seriousness by overestimating the importance of a personal quarrel between Norris and Locke. She concludes her essay with this summation: "the stimulus for these three papers came directly from Norris, from his criticisms of the newly published Essay, and still more from his personal relationship with Locke"; otherwise, "Locke's opposition to the theory of vision in God would surely have remained unexpressed, since he felt the notion to be sufficiently absurd to die of its own accord.

Hobbes` Rwandan Leviathan Essay

In 1994 the world publicity was shaken by the events in Rwanda, which later were written down in the history books as ‘Rwanda crisis’. According to the local sources, however, this tragedy had been rooted long before the indicated year, particularly it is reported to start in 1990. 1990 is marked by Uganda forces having invaded Rwanda. In addition, this was aggravated by the fact that two presidents of Burundi were assassinated. In order to get the more complete outlook on the situation before the crisis one should be aware that in 1994 (before the black day of the President of Rwanda, Habyarimana, killing) there were one million of displaced people in Rwanda constantly fleeing from the north of the country to the capital Kigali (1, 2006). Hence, to accommodate for all this vast mass a very huge refugee camp had been organized. After their President was killed these people rushed to the city to grab everything they could. As a result there were more than 300 000 deaths between 1990 and 1994, which prevents us from limiting the crisis to the year of 1994 only (1, 2006). But this was only a preface. In brief, the Rwanda crisis can be described as follows: â€Å"The lives of nearly a million people had been taken within 100 days in 1994, as extremist members of the Hutu majority turned on the Tutsi minority and moderate Hutus, vowing to exterminate the Tutsi and their influence on Rwandan society† (2, 1994:4). This massacre was stopped only when the Tutsi-dominated Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) threw down the acting genocidal government. Yet, that developed into another blood bath with over two million of Hutu refugees heading for Burundi, Tanzania, Uganda and Zaire (current the Democratic Republic of Congo), etc. Just five days from July 14 to 18, 1994 about 850,000 people crossed the border to Goma in eastern Zaire (2, 1994:5). Even today these to the great extent, innocent Hutus are deprived of basic human rights and numerous cases are known when their human rights have been abused by the RPF (that is now at the helm) and they were returned by force to their Motherland where they do not have any rights at all. The major part of the refugees fled out because of fear convinced (owning to Hutu Power propaganda) that the Tutsi were a â€Å"subhuman† race willing to enslave and extirpate the Hutu people. However, their genocidaires quickly took over the refugee camps. Instead of safety refugees found intimidation, starvation, tortures and death. International humanitarian organizations were powerless and forced to provide aid through the genocidaires or just leave hundreds of thousands of refugees in trouble and distress. The Rwanda crisis proved how unprepared was the international community to dealing with refugee crises that involved threats to peace and security in the world. What is more, the novel Rwandan government together with their allies from Zaire attacked and wiped the refugee camps off the face of the earth claiming that ‘the camps posed incredible and intolerable threat to Rwandan security’ (3, 2006). Thousands and thousands of refugees were killed. Thousands more fell victims to cholera that set in along with other contagious diseases (such as dysentery, malaria, etc. ) as a consequence of people’s exhaustion, lack of food and drinking water. One may suppose that the described above conflict and crises that follows may definitely be a vivid example of Hobbes’ ‘rational’ theory according to which every man lives in fear, as well as the father of rational philosophy did himself. Hobbes once mentioned: â€Å"Fear and I were born twins together† (4, 1996; I: 11). In his main theoretical work and his masterpiece, the Leviathan, Hobbes suggested that there are two methods of state formation: commonwealth by institution commonwealth by acquisition (4, 1996; XIX: 147). With regard to the former, Hobbes supposed that at the uprise of civilization, individuals existed in such state of nature, when life was a perpetual conflict in which men were one another’s enemies. Furthermore, different individuals had relatively equal power, thus being unable to guarantee actual personal security for themselves. As a result, due to such hostile environment, the individual, suffers â€Å"continued fear, and the danger of violent death † and a way of life that is â€Å"solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short† (4, 1996, I: 12). Even more, â€Å"nature hath made men so equal in faculties of body and mind†¦Ã¢â‚¬  that no â€Å"man can thereupon claim to himself any benefit to which another may not pretend as well as he† (4, 1996, XVII: 118). In general, this may be regarded as a society without acting laws and authorities with â€Å"all man have a right to everything†, and situation when â€Å"no action can be unjust† (4, 1996, XVII: 118). Moreover, the described state of nature leads, according to Hobbes, to the condition of war – â€Å"war of all against all,† in which human constantly seeks to destroy each other in an incessant pursuit for power (4, 1996, XVII: 118). However, this is not the war we are used to denote with this word. It is rather a condition of awareness about enemies than the act of violence itself. Instead of promoting war, Hobbes emphasizes that war cannot bring any benefits or provide any additional security. His purpose is to convince the readers that ruling power would save people from those unnecessary perils caused by the state of nature. Hence, such unfavorable state of nature, as Hobbes puts it, should and will prompt individuals to organize a ‘civil state’ with a monopolistic sovereign on the head by means of force and coercion. Such monopoly with absolute power will be able to ensure to the individuals safety from other members of their society, as well as protect from external intrusion. Therefore, from the recognition of the necessity for social order and peace people consent to obey to the sovereign. (4, 1996; XVIII: 127). Therefore, it would be more accurate to consider Hobbes’s ‘war’ to be a kind of competition or contest not the real military operations involving victims and bloodshed. It can be compared even to the emulation between two men who want to attract some woman they both like. Moreover, the author of Leviathan himself drives us to this conclusion by the following words: â€Å"So that in the nature of man, we find three principal causes of quarrel. First, competition; secondly, diffidence; thirdly, glory† (4, 1996; XVII: 119). He explains this again by the human nature, namely its faults: â€Å"†¦ all men are by nature provided of notable magnifying glasses (that is their Passions and Self-love,) through which, every little payment appeareth a great grievance; but are destitute of those perspective glasses, (namely Moral and Civil Science,) to see a farre off the miseries that hang over them, and cannot without such payments be avoided. † From this point of view, it seems, to my mind, obvious, that Rwanda civil war is not the case of Hobbes’ ‘state of war’. For Hobbes seizure of power meant improvement of the living conditions of people, even more it was the only way of providing them. The best society organization, from his standpoint, was the commonwealth in the meaning â€Å"a multitude of people who together consent to a sovereign authority, established by contract to have absolute power over them all, for the purpose of providing peace and common defense† (4, 1996; XVII:124). As it has been mentioned, â€Å"the purpose of establishing a commonwealth is to escape the state of nature and to provide peace and the common defense of the people; the sovereign is responsible for ensuring this defense† (4, 1996; XVII: 124). Remarkably, that the so-called ‘sovereign’ should not necessarily be a single person – it (or ‘he’ as Hobbes uses denotes it) may be comprised of a group of people who purpose at a common aim. Moreover, the sovereign’s task is not limited to promoting safety of the people but according to Hobbes, it covers also promotion of economic well-being of the community, sufficient nutrition, etc. By the latter Hobbes implies â€Å"distribution of materials conducing to life : in concoction, or preparation, and (when concocted) in the conveyance of it, by convenient conduits, to the public use. † (4, 1996; XVII: 126). Furthermore, ruling from the fact that there is no such state that can fully supply itself with all necessary resources, as â€Å"there is no territory under the dominion of one commonwealth, (except it be of very vast extent,) produceth all the things needful for the maintenance of the whole body,† Hobbes supposes that the state will import goods or resources from other states through normal trade (4, 1996; XVIII: 137). Hence, as we can see the situation with Rwanda coup d’etat and Hobbes’ process ad goal of taking power are worlds apart. The same refers to the consequences. Whereas the latter should theoretically results in prosperity of the citizens, the former lead, in fact, to the numerous casualties, famine, etc. Furthermore, in Rwanda there was no realization of ‘rational choices’, rather it was the outburst of ethnic hostility than an effort to capture power in order to improve the welfare of the people. In addition, though Hobbes’ tenet primarily touches upon sovereignty established on the basis of agreement, the scientist maintains that sovereignty reached through acquisition i. e. force entails the same rights and obligations covered by the contract (also called ‘covenant’ or ‘social contract’, which is â€Å"the act of giving up certain natural rights and transferring them to someone else, on the condition that everyone else involved in making the contract also simultaneously gives up their rights. People agreeing to the contract retain only those rights over others that they are content for everyone else to retain over them†) (4, 1996; XVIII: 139). The only difference is the way in which the sovereign comes to power. If a sovereign comes to rule by institution he is supported because people fear each other. And, in contrast, if he comes to rule by acquisition he is supported because people are afraid of him himself, which does not goes apart with the theory of state of nature. Hence, in both cases, the people literally enjoy the same rights, whereas in Rwanda they were completely deprived of any rights. Nevertheless, for Hobbes the second method can be compared with slave-master relationships (without a slave having right to rebel), in Hobbes’s own words: â€Å"The master of the servant, is master also of all he hath; and may exact the use thereof; that is to say, of his goods, of his labour, of his servant, and of his children, as often as he shall think fit. For he holdeth his life of his master, by the covenant of obedience; that is, of owning, and authorizing whatsoever the master shall do. And in case the master, if he refuse, kill him, or cast him into bonds, or otherwise punish him for his disobedience, he is himself the author of the same, and cannot accuse him of injury† (4, 1996; XVIII: 141). David Gauthier also argues that â€Å"a servant is hardly involved in the decision making calculus of the master; instead the servant exists to carry out the former’s dictates† (5, 2000:114). Yet, on the Rwanda’s example, the people defended and rebelled against their genocidaires, thus, they refused to perform the role of servants presupposed by Hobbes. To sum up, the Rwanda crisis has nothing in common with possible transfer to Hobbes’ model of state organization. It was founded on the ethnic hostilities that caused in the long run change of ruling power. Moreover, the purpose of the new government, in my opinion, was not the welfare of the people and the country but mere revenge for years of oppression. What is more, the people, though proving to some extent their natural (in accordance with Hobbes) inclination to being enemies to each other, did not resign themselves to the fact that they should be obedient and humble servants but rebelled instead and fought until the last breath. Nevertheless, even if the conflict is motivated by not the ethnic animosity but the rational choice, I will not recommend Hobbes’ reform of the society organization. At first glance, the objective and functions of his Commonwealth seem to be very promising, for example, preserving the society, establishing an internal order or peace, defending that peace against external violence, etc so that after all individuals can live peaceably (4, 1996; XVIII:145). However, I do not believe in such Utopia as for me it is evident that Hobbes’ state has all features of what is considered or ca turn in future into the totalitarian state (recall those master-slave relationships, overall power of the sovereign, etc. ). Our history has already proven that this form of governing is not applicable and is out-of-date with regard to our world and our life. Whatever the conflicts are, and no matter what leaders come to the rule they should bear in mind that our future is democratic one and there is no place on the earth to dictators and totalitarianism. Bibliography 1. Rwanda the Great Genocide Debate. Retrieved from University of Dayton Library on February 14, 2006: http://www. udayton. edu/~rwanda/articles/genocide/noendinsight.html 2. Rwandan apocalypse by Chris McGreal in Goma, Ian Katz from Guardian, Saturday July 23, 1994, p. 4-6. 3. The Rwanda Crisis: History of a Genocide 1959-1994, published by Hurst and Company Ltd, 1995. Retrieved on February 14, 2006 from: http://www. humanrightsfirst. org 4. Hobbes, Thomas (ed. ) Tuck, Richard â€Å"Leviathan†. Cambridge University Press, 1996 5. Gauthier, D. P. (2000). The Logic of the Leviathan: The Moral and Political Theory of Thomas Hobbes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 114-116.

Who Were the November Criminals

The nickname November Criminals was given to the German politicians who negotiated and signed the armistice which ended World War I  in November of 1918. The November Criminals were named so by German political opponents who thought the German army had enough strength to continue and that surrendering was a betrayal or crime, that the German army had not actually lost on the battlefront. These political opponents were chiefly right-wingers, and the idea that the November Criminals had ‘stabbed Germany in the back’ by engineering surrender was partly created by the German military itself, who maneuvered the situation so the civilians would be blamed for conceding a war that the generals also felt couldn’t be won, but which they didn’t wish to admit. Many of the November Criminals were a part of the early resistance members who eventually spearheaded the German Revolution of 1918 - 1919, several of which went on to serve as heads of the  Weimar Republic  which would serve as the basis for the post-war German reconstruction in the years to come. The Politicians Who Ended World War I In early 1918, World War One was raging and German forces on the western front were still holding conquered territory  but their forces were finite and being pushed to exhaustion while the enemies were benefitting from millions of fresh United States troops. While Germany might have won in the east, many troops were tied down holding their gains. The German commander Eric Ludendorff, therefore, decided to make one final great attack to try and break the western front open before the US arrived in strength. The attack made large gains at first but petered out and was pushed back; the allies followed this up by inflicting The Black Day of the German Army when they started to push the Germans back beyond their defenses, and Ludendorff suffered a mental breakdown. When he recovered, Ludendorff decided Germany could not win and would need to seek an armistice, but he also knew the military would be blamed, and decided to move this blame elsewhere. Power was transferred to a civilian government, who had to go surrender and negotiate a peace, allowing the military to stand back and claim they could have carried on: after all, Germans forces were still in enemy territory. As Germany went through a transition from imperial military command to a socialist revolution that led to a democratic government, the old soldiers blamed these November Criminals for abandoning the war effort. Hindenburg, Ludendorff’s notional superior, said the Germans had been stabbed in the back by these civilians, and the Treaty of Versailles’ harsh terms did nothing to prevent the criminals idea festering. In all of this, the military escaped the blame and was seen as exceptional while the emerging socialists were held falsely at fault. Exploitation: From Soldiers to Hitlers Revisionist History Conservative politicians against the quasi-socialist reform and restoration efforts of the Weimar Republic capitalized on this myth and spread it through much of the 1920s, targeting those that agreed with former soldiers who felt they had wrongfully been told to cease fighting, which led to much civic unrest from right-wing groups at the time. When Adolf Hitler emerged in the German political scene later that decade, he recruited these ex-soldiers, military elites, and disaffect men who believed those in power had rolled over for the Allied Armies, taking their dictation instead of negotiating a proper treaty. Hitler  wielded the stab in the back myth  and the November Criminals surgically to enhance his own power and plans. He used this narrative that Marxists, Socialists, Jews, and traitors had caused the failure of Germany in the Great War (in which Hitler had fought and been injured) and found widespread followers of the lie in the post-war German population. This played a key and direct role in Hitlers rise to power, capitalizing on the egos and fears of the citizenry, and its ultimately why people should still be wary of what they regard as real history — after all, its the victors of wars that write the history books, so people like Hitler most certainly tried to rewrite some history!